12 responses

  1. Mike Daemon
    August 7, 2016

    The headline is misleading.

    Reply

    • Mandy
      August 7, 2016

      How so?

      Reply

      • Chandler B.
        August 7, 2016

        He was arrested for ‘allegedly’ raping and infecting his daughter. He stands accused and hasn’t been convicted yet. He hasn’t been found guilty by a court. The headline already proclaims him guilty.

        Reply

      • Mandy
        August 7, 2016

        That is the default of headlines. Especially when the aim is sensationalism. To draw you in first of all, so you can read the facts therein. Not exactly a reason to get one’s knickers in a bind.

        Reply

  2. ambivalentone
    August 7, 2016

    #sigh How do u even live with urself after that?

    Reply

  3. Mandy
    August 7, 2016

    I honestly, honestly, seriously, truthfully, sincerely do not get the desire that pushes grown men to ravish little girls. Like really, HOW? What is in a little girl to get your dick up? What?! This is why ill forever detest our pedophilic legislators who are using the constitution to hide their disease. How on earth do u find a prepubescent girl attractive enough to lie with her? How?!

    Reply

    • Drone
      August 7, 2016

      This comment just reminded me of how some people might see homosexuals. That said, I’m not playing devil’s advocate, but it’s actually documented that sexual attractions towards such young people legitimately exist. What I find wrong however, is that the other party gets the short end of the stick, in terms of the ability to consent and the level of harm caused by the act. That is what makes pedophilia irredeemably wrong. What I find very malicious here is an adult father doing it to their own child.

      Reply

      • Mandy
        August 7, 2016

        My disgust for a pedophile reminds you of homophobia, eh? Ok o. Kontinu. Your devil’s advocacy is looking good on you.

        Reply

      • Drone
        August 7, 2016

        Bros, chill. It was only a reminder. Replace “little / prepubescent girls” with “other men” in your statement and see what I mean. I didn’t disagree, it just reminds me of the typical comments used on gays.

        Reply

      • Francis
        August 7, 2016

        I see your point!

        Reply

      • ambivalentone
        August 7, 2016

        Typical, yes. But they never always take their reasonings to the next level which u have already addressed-“Was/Is it consensual?” That’s what makes their comments wrong, stupid and lacking in depth. So in no way are they/should they be paired

        Reply

  4. Mitch
    August 7, 2016

    It is a wah!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop