7 responses

  1. ambivalentone
    October 16, 2016

    Seriously, this was like a comment more than a thought-out article.

    Reply

    • Chuck
      October 16, 2016

      And the use of wikipedia for legal definitions doesn’t help. Terms used in the law are defined and codified by other laws. Not by wikipedia or internet lists

      I’m also wary of the “we all sin”rebuttal to homophobia. That confirms the right of homophobes to determine whether homosexuality is Ok. In my view homosexuality is perfectly fine so I avoid “it’s a sin like others” arguments

      Reply

    • Francis
      October 16, 2016

      In my opinion, most peeps no dey siddon read assimilate long ass well written articles especially on matters like this one.

      This Zikoko format was well executed.

      Reply

    • Oludayo A.
      October 16, 2016

      While I don’t want to detract from the article

      The logic started loosening when I read.
      “… against the order of nature. ” (So t
      Deviant sexual acts are against the order of nature.

      It should be, The Nigerian constitution defined
      “against the order of nature” as….

      Reply

  2. Mandy
    October 16, 2016

    It should really be easy not to be homophobic, or perhaps to be antigay and be on your lane. It should be easy. Why is prejudice so quick not to mind its business?

    Reply

  3. Tiercel de Claron
    October 16, 2016

    That’s the Criminal Code,not the Constitution.
    People should learn to differentiate between the ground norm and Acts of parliament

    Reply

  4. Bain
    October 17, 2016

    may God bless who ever wrote this article….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

Back to top
mobile desktop