Woman Sues Gay Friend For Child Support, 16 Years After He Donated Sperm To Her

Woman Sues Gay Friend For Child Support, 16 Years After He Donated Sperm To Her

A gay man who helped his friend conceive two children might be rethinking his kind deed, as she is now suing some him sixteen years later. That woman, now a medical doctor, is taking advantage of a loophole in Ontario law that allows for known sperm and egg donors to be held liable for child support based on biology alone, the Montreal Gazette reports.

There is a bill before the provincial legislature to amend the Children’s Law Reform Act, which could close the loophole, but perhaps too late for Michael Ranson, said his lawyer, Shirley Levitan.

Ranson met Dr. Amie Cullimore in 1991 and in 2000 she called on him to fulfill an old promise to donate his sperm so she could undergo IVF, court documents state.

He agreed to stay involved in their lives, since he had no plans of having his own children, but “never would have donated if had he known she was seeking any financial support from him,” his legal team claims.

The pair signed an agreement in 2002, granting full custody to the mother and saying she “would not look to Ranson for any financial support.”

If Cullimore is successful in her suit, Ranson will be responsible for four years of retroactive child support, since 2012, as well as other expenses, including post-secondary education.

“He feels like now he’s being punished for having been a good spuncle [slang term for known sperm donor],” his legal representative said. “How does he maintain a good relationship with these kids now?

“This is not something he signed on for.”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Previous EMERALD THOUGHTS (PART 2)
Next Straight guy accidentally visits the filthiest gay sex club in Berlin, writes a must-read Yelp review on his experience

About author

You might also like

The Happenings 14 Comments

Straight Man Not Happy With Girlfriend For Rejecting Anal Intercourse

As more and more straight men embrace the idea of anal stimulation, some are finding their female counterparts not so into the idea. One particular Reddit user says he’s reached

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
The Happenings 17 Comments

Rev. Franklin Graham Denounces Gay Christians As “The Enemy” In Radio Interview

In today’s episode of Evangelical Christians Be Cray, Rev. Franklin Graham is going all the way in on gay Christians, and pretty much the entire LGBT community. Since crazy loves

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
The Happenings 40 Comments

Husband of 9/11 Hero sends award back because of Caitlyn Jenner

The husband of a policewoman killed on 9/11 returned his wife’s posthumous Woman of the Year award to Glamour after the magazine gave the same honor last week to Caitlyn

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

9 Comments

  1. Mandy
    November 02, 06:52 Reply

    All this Canadian law is succeeding in doing is ruin sperm donor’s willingness to ever donate sperm. Like seriously, just imagine how a man’s goodwill has come back to bite him in the ass. Mscheeewwwww.

  2. Dennis Macaulay
    November 02, 07:07 Reply

    Wait what? My friend has been pressured me into agreeing to be her sperm donor if she doesn’t get married by 35, since I don’t plan to have any kids.

    Let me kuku send her this article Abeg, I kent shout ???

  3. .•*Sugaar.•*
    November 02, 13:32 Reply

    The man sef too dumb… Even if you know that you don’t need the children, but you dey give your sperms,,, common sense must have told him that he’s got he’s seeds somewhere. And wether he like it or not he’s a father. As far as your sperms ate used some where you never care, one day the kids will locate you and you can’t just hide away from that shit you tot you did to help some one. Ctew it’s annoying… The whole thing is just shit …
    I feel like breaking bottle (Esther in jenifa’s diary) ?

  4. Delle
    November 02, 17:42 Reply

    That woman is just a witch shaa. People do not regard one’s good deeds anymore. SMH.

    Spuncle? ? could that be a fusion of SPUNK and UNCLE? Oh Church!

  5. Juphet
    January 27, 02:49 Reply

    It’s just right because he’s the father of the child. What’s wrong is the action of the mother who sues the gay. She benefited having the child in the first place.

Leave a Reply