Woman Sues Gay Friend For Child Support, 16 Years After He Donated Sperm To Her

Woman Sues Gay Friend For Child Support, 16 Years After He Donated Sperm To Her

A gay man who helped his friend conceive two children might be rethinking his kind deed, as she is now suing some him sixteen years later. That woman, now a medical doctor, is taking advantage of a loophole in Ontario law that allows for known sperm and egg donors to be held liable for child support based on biology alone, the Montreal Gazette reports.

There is a bill before the provincial legislature to amend the Children’s Law Reform Act, which could close the loophole, but perhaps too late for Michael Ranson, said his lawyer, Shirley Levitan.

Ranson met Dr. Amie Cullimore in 1991 and in 2000 she called on him to fulfill an old promise to donate his sperm so she could undergo IVF, court documents state.

He agreed to stay involved in their lives, since he had no plans of having his own children, but “never would have donated if had he known she was seeking any financial support from him,” his legal team claims.

The pair signed an agreement in 2002, granting full custody to the mother and saying she “would not look to Ranson for any financial support.”

If Cullimore is successful in her suit, Ranson will be responsible for four years of retroactive child support, since 2012, as well as other expenses, including post-secondary education.

“He feels like now he’s being punished for having been a good spuncle [slang term for known sperm donor],” his legal representative said. “How does he maintain a good relationship with these kids now?

“This is not something he signed on for.”

Print Friendly
Previous EMERALD THOUGHTS (PART 2)
Next Straight guy accidentally visits the filthiest gay sex club in Berlin, writes a must-read Yelp review on his experience

About author

You might also like

The Happenings 6 Comments

Soccer player Gerard Piqué distracted by opponent’s huge something-something

In the below video, soccer player Gerard Piqué — who plays for Barcelona and just so happens to be Shakira’s husband — is clearly preoccupied with what’s going on inside

Print Friendly
The Happenings 14 Comments

Chris Hemsworth crowned People Magazine’s Sexiest Man Alive

So it wasn’t Neil Patrick Harris after all. Oh no, it’s the dude who smites bad guys as a hammer-wielding Norse god in The Avengers. Chris Hemsworth will also get

Print Friendly
The Happenings 109 Comments

Pastor Claims That Every Gay Person Will Soon Become Cannibals Going Through Hospitals For Human Waste

Oh, brother. Here we go again. Pastor James David Manning announced plans this week to march against “sodomite cannibals” in Manhattan (a.k.a. “Sodomite City”) because — wait for it —

Print Friendly

9 Comments

  1. Mandy
    November 02, 06:52 Reply

    All this Canadian law is succeeding in doing is ruin sperm donor’s willingness to ever donate sperm. Like seriously, just imagine how a man’s goodwill has come back to bite him in the ass. Mscheeewwwww.

  2. Dennis Macaulay
    November 02, 07:07 Reply

    Wait what? My friend has been pressured me into agreeing to be her sperm donor if she doesn’t get married by 35, since I don’t plan to have any kids.

    Let me kuku send her this article Abeg, I kent shout ???

  3. .•*Sugaar.•*
    November 02, 13:32 Reply

    The man sef too dumb… Even if you know that you don’t need the children, but you dey give your sperms,,, common sense must have told him that he’s got he’s seeds somewhere. And wether he like it or not he’s a father. As far as your sperms ate used some where you never care, one day the kids will locate you and you can’t just hide away from that shit you tot you did to help some one. Ctew it’s annoying… The whole thing is just shit …
    I feel like breaking bottle (Esther in jenifa’s diary) ?

  4. Delle
    November 02, 17:42 Reply

    That woman is just a witch shaa. People do not regard one’s good deeds anymore. SMH.

    Spuncle? ? could that be a fusion of SPUNK and UNCLE? Oh Church!

  5. Juphet
    January 27, 02:49 Reply

    It’s just right because he’s the father of the child. What’s wrong is the action of the mother who sues the gay. She benefited having the child in the first place.

Leave a Reply