Nigerian Government bans Twitter “indefinitely” following deletion of President Buhari’s tweet

Nigerian Government bans Twitter “indefinitely” following deletion of President Buhari’s tweet

Through its Ministry of Information and Culture today, the Nigerian government announced its decision to suspend the operations of the social media platform, Twitter, in the country.

The statement, made by Minister of Information and Culture, Lai Mohammed, and signed off by his media aide Segun Adeyemi, could see telecoms in the country prevent Nigerians from using Twitter. The statement reads:

“The Federal Government has suspended indefinitely the operations of the microblogging and social networking service Twitter in Nigeria. The Minister of Information and Culture, Alhaji Lai Mohammed, announced the suspension in a statement issued in Abuja on Friday, citing the persistent use of the platform for activities that are capable of undermining Nigeria’s corporate existence.

“The Minister said the Federal Government has also directed the National Broadcasting Commission (NBC) to immediately commence the process of licensing all OTT and social media operations in Nigeria.”

Today’s announcement is a culmination of events that have happened this past week. Twitter deleted tweets and videos of President Muhammadu Buhari making threats of punishment to a sect called IPOB in the South-Eastern part of the country, after he blamed them for attacks on government buildings. He then referenced Nigeria’s civil war events in the 1960s, which seemed to offend many Nigerians.

Buhari, who was Nigeria’s Head of State in the 1980s and served in the army against secessionists, said young Nigerians in the country’s southeastern part are too young to remember the horrible events that occurred during the war. According to him, the activities of the present-day secessionists are likely headed toward war; hence, it was proactive to stop them beforehand with force.

“Those of us in the fields for 30 months, who went through the war, will treat them in the language they understand,” he said.

This caused an outrage among Nigerians who flooded Twitter with reports against the tweet, which was perceived to be genocidal. Twitter chose to delete the tweet for its violation of the site’s abusive behaviour policy and after several calls by Nigerians to take it down. Twitter also suspended the president’s account, leaving it in a “read-only mode” for 12 hours.

Following this move, Lai Mohammed called out the social media giant by saying its decision was biased and said the president had a right to express his thoughts on events that affect the country. He also raised suspicion about the platform’s intention in the country. “Twitter may have its own rules; it’s not the universal rule. If Mr President anywhere in the world feels very bad and concerned about a situation, he is free to express such views… The mission of Twitter in Nigeria is very, very suspect,” he said.

In a retaliation act, the government has proceeded to suspend the platform’s operations in the country. While Twitter doesn’t have any offices in the country, this announcement can still play out. And although there hasn’t been any social media ban yet, Nigeria’s current administration is no stranger to making ploys to restrict access to the internet, certain websites or social media. It was one of the tactics used during the EndSARS protests that rocked the country in October 2020. Given past events in other African countries, where the internet has been restricted or banned in one form or another, this is an obvious ploy by the Nigerian government to double down on these tactics and use telecoms operators to repress free speech.

Twitter, which recently opened its first African office in Ghana, reportedly said that “the announcement made by the Nigerian Government that they have suspended Twitter’s operations in Nigeria is deeply concerning. We’re investigating and will provide updates when we know more.”

Back in April, Twitter opted for Ghana to be its African headquarters when many thought the social media company would’ve chosen Nigeria. It cited the former’s support of free speech, online freedom, and the Open Internet as reasons for its choice, which was a smart move judging by today’s event.

Twitter, however, isn’t the only social media platform to take down President Buhari’s offensive comments. Facebook also removed the controversial statement posted via the president’s official page.

Following reports from many Nigerian users, the platform followed Twitter’s lead and removed the same post from its platform.

“In line with our global policies, we’ve removed a post from President Buhari’s Facebook page for violating our Community Standards against inciting violence. We remove any content, from individuals or organisations that violates our policies on Facebook,” the platform stated.

Although the post is no longer available on Buhari’s timeline, it is sustained on other Facebook accounts including his aide’s, Femi Adesina.

It is, however, unclear if the Nigerian government would suspend the operations of Facebook as it did to Twitter earlier today for bringing down the same statement.

Previous ‘Call Me By Your Name’ Sequel May No Longer Be Happening
Next The Proposal: Three Nigerian Men Are Looking For Queer Women To Partner With In Contract Marriages

About author

You might also like

The Happenings 6 Comments

Gay man opens up about vengeful ex sending their sex tape to his boss and family

A man has spoken out after his ex posted their sex tape on the internet and sent it to his boss. The man, known only as Mr. A, has revealed

The Happenings 3 Comments

Sitcom ‘Friends’ comes to Netflix and viewers are shocked at the show’s homophobia, transphobia and misogyny

Friends is probably one of the most known series, and that is the reasons that millions of fans were thrilled when it was announced that it would be coming to

The Happenings 7 Comments

Botswana’s High Court Rules To Decriminalise Homosexuality

Botswana’s High Court has ruled in favour of decriminalising homosexuality in a landmark decision for campaigners. The High Court rejected laws that impose up to seven years in prison for

1 Comment

  1. Rudy
    June 05, 14:03 Reply

    This is quite deeply concerning.

    How someone’s emotional tantrum results in the stiffening of freedom of speech of the population beats my imagination.

Leave a Reply