OnlyFans Content Creator, Drevon Odoms, protests the attention of his homosexual followers and insists he’s not gay

OnlyFans Content Creator, Drevon Odoms, protests the attention of his homosexual followers and insists he’s not gay

OnlyFans has increasingly blurred the lines between gay and gay-for-pay performers, with everyone scrambling for the bag when it comes to the gay community. There might as well not be any boundaries when it comes to sexuality, as even heterosexual performers have taken to pushing past their limits in order to give their followers what they’re increasingly on their pages to see and pay for.

And for so long, content creator, Drevon Odoms known with his stage name, Dre TanksnLove, played it safe. The closest he ever came to homosexual content were jerk-off videos with other male performers, such as Malik Joseph. His more risqué videos were very heterosexual content of his sexcapades with his girlfriend.

Then, days ago, he surprised his fans when he released a video of him engaging in anal sex with frequent co-performer, Malik Joseph (who himself is gay).

This must have broken the bounds of restraint from his followers, leading to a flooding of his DM with racy messages, because he took to Twitter to object to all the messages, stating categorically that he is not gay.

“Please guys … I know the videos I make send that way,” he wrote, “but please I’m not trying to call anyone out but this is getting out of hand. I’m not gay, guys, I don’t want to see your assholes or dicks in my dm. I orchestrate a business page. Dm me about business. Not that other stuff.”

Of course, his comments section was split with varying reactions, from those who supported his objection, demanding for his followers to respect that he’s just selling a fantasy and stop bothering him…

To those who either didn’t believe his claim of not being gay or chastised him for not knowing to deal with the attention as a byproduct of his content targeted at gay men.

There were those who took umbrage with him even bringing up the clarification of his sexuality.

And those who were just there to blame the gay community for patronising gay-for-pay performers when they should be supporting those in their community.

What do y’all think? Should the gays leave Dre TanksnLove’s DM alone or should he get with the program that this is what he gets for pandering to the homosexual coins?

Previous “He’s A Whiny, Sulky, Petulant, Grinchy, Vindictive Super-soft B***h!” Actor Edward Norton posts a scathing attack on Donald Trump
Next Charly Boy Talks About His Love For His Lesbian Daughter … But She Calls Him Out For Being A Hypocrite

About author

You might also like

The Happenings 2 Comments

Shawn Mendes is so over being called gay

Canadian singer Shawn Mendes has opened up about how he feels about everyone thinking that he’s gay: he doesn’t like it. He recently sat down with Rolling Stone and the

The Happenings 20 Comments

Gay Man Taking PrEP Daily Tests Positive For HIV

For the first time, researchers have documented a case in which an individual has contracted a multi-drug resistant strain of HIV. The man claims that at the time, he was

The Happenings 3 Comments

TIERs presents the poster of upcoming movie

All week, The Initiative for Equal Rights (TIERs) had been teasing us with behind-the-scenes photos of an upcoming movie project simply identified with the hashtag #WDLHA. Today, they finally unveiled

24 Comments

  1. Bliss
    November 21, 07:58 Reply

    He was even fucked..
    Biko he is still in denial..

    Some ladies get upset n annoyed when yhu mention fucking them in the ass, not to even talk of doing it.. Not to talk of the guy receiving d*** so good.

  2. Mitch
    November 21, 08:36 Reply

    Whether he topped or he bottomed isn’t the issue here. Heterosexual men have been known to engage in same-sex intimacy, flipping to whatever side of the bedroom position that suits them while they are at it.

    However, just the same way we contend that gay people fucking or marrying people of the opposite sex does not make them heterosexual or bi, we need to maintain that same energy when we see a heterosexual person engage in same-sex intimacy.

    Do I think the flooding of his DMs with requests by queer people is okay? Hell’s no!!!
    I mean, we rail against men sending unwanted and unwarranted nudes to women. I do not understand how we think it is normal to send them to other men, gay or not.

    At the same time, I believe there is always going to be a downside to every action one takes. An action such as this, this choosing to pander to homo-eroticism in a bid to secure the pink bag alongside the hetero bag, would definitely have its repercussions. Repercussions which include both the subtle and blatant propositioning from gay men, as well as other forms of what, to the heterosexual person, would most likely be called harassment.

    So, meh!
    He’s made a post saying queer people should let him be. Hopefully, he’d also learn to not peddle a fantasy and expect that no one would come on to him, believing the fantasy he’s peddling to be reality.

  3. Bliss
    November 21, 10:02 Reply

    For me
    Queer flooding his Dm is very wrong.. Totally

    But i have stayed with people that at the mention of queer sex, they either forbid it or get disgust.. In my view, i think having same sex takes you to another lifestyle (like yhu are curious or whateva)…
    And gay men who marry women, is due to the fact of how the world sees it..
    Him having same sex not even behind close doors means he has done it not once. And he kinda enjoyed doing more.. (he did enjoy the work that’s why he did it for the camera)

    • Black Dynasty
      November 21, 11:22 Reply

      His motivation might be financial pressures, you don’t know his life. This is usually the same for gay for pay porn stars.

      If gay men, particularly men who prefer to bottom can marry a woman, have sex with her and have kids due to societal pressure…then the same energy should be applied to str8 men having sex with a man for money.

      Fundamentally it’s done because of some sort of pressure and we should learn to respect people’s choices if we expect ours to be respected in turn.

      • This is an awful way of saying “straight men are oppressed, too!!” If he is doing gay for pay, then why is he complaining about receiving interest from his target audience??

        • Black Dynasty
          November 22, 09:15 Reply

          If that’s your interpretation, that’s fine but those were not my words.

          My point with my response was to point out the need to not judge, especially from a group of people like us who are constantly asking to not be judged. He could be in denial, he could truly be gay for pay…. point is, it’s his body, his mind, his choice and folks will have to respect his decisions.

          I should also add that he as a black man in America is most certainly facing oppression of a kind most Africans wouldn’t comprehend.

          In summary, live and let live.

  4. Black Dynasty
    November 21, 11:25 Reply

    I really don’t get the fascination with straight men when there is an abundance of gay men to oogle and enjoy in adult movies.

    Long throat maybe?

    • Marvey
      November 21, 12:49 Reply

      Did u actually read the story? let me say it in pidgin in case you didn’t get it..the Koko be say the man they make money from doing gay porn but he no gree say him be gay..so it’s only but normal for people to fantasize over him cos that’s the impression his business gives them…plus is Soo funny how a self acclaimed straight guy bottoms so we’ll does it so often, plays both role perfectly well even overdo it join and will come out to say he is not gay…cos we all know sex comes with feelings and with feelings attachment….. weird and strange…

      • Black Dynasty
        November 22, 09:09 Reply

        Yes, i read the story in full and my initial statement stands.

        Why give attention and money to men who claim they are not gay yet act gay porn? Why pay them any attention at all when they make statements like he did to reject gay men? Why not give said attention and money to actual gay men doing gay porn?

        This is why i don’t get the fascination with str8 men, especially gay for pay. They get your money, attention and still reject you.

        • Marvey
          November 22, 13:45 Reply

          Is not about fascination that he is straight…. people are acting on the impression he have them that he is gay from doin the scenes so we’ll .if he is so straight he shuld stick to straight porn then ..the guy is werey in disguise

    • Flexsterous
      November 24, 05:54 Reply

      I don’t get it either, the thought that a man doing doing gay porn isn’t actually attracted to men is my biggest turn off.

      It’s probably why I would never enjoy a lap dance because I can’t know the sexuality of the dancer, and sometimes this turn off extends to bi men.

      I would never give my money to someone who says he’s straight, that’s why I stopped watching corbin Fisher a long time ago, hot men who are absolutely boring to watch cause they don’t seem to be enjoying what they’re doing, when actual gay men like cutler x, Antonio biaggi, keptsecretxxx, etc exist.

      • Black Dynasty
        November 24, 08:31 Reply

        This, you get exactly what i meant. Once i understand that they identify as straight, I’m immediately put off and never watch or partake in anything related to them.

  5. Babji
    November 21, 15:09 Reply

    So just to make sure I got it right, this dude was fucked on camera by another dude BUT we all agree he is straight.

    Jerks off with other men, on camera and gets off , had his ass rimmed and etc

    Seems about right, thank God I do not give my money to anyone on only fans

    Good day to all of us faggots and homos

  6. Delle
    November 21, 16:07 Reply

    It’s Chad Bailey for me

    The actual fuck!

  7. I find it laughable that a pornstar will complain about receiving nudes. Doesn’t make any sense. I’m a director and writers send me unsolicited scripts. I check them out and get back to whoever is worth responding to. Or I just entirely ignore them, but to come out and complain about it is to show how wildly uninterested I am in my work as a director. So, yeah, Drovan is either shying away from his gayness or just terrible at what he does. I meet my lecturers to ask about varying topics that concern theatre, if they shun me, then I know that this lecturer is bad at their job. Drovan, it is nudity. You are a pornstar. People will flood your dm with nudity because you are a pornstar. What kind they send to you only matters if you are going to respond to them. Now, shut up and get back to work. Or just quit your job.

    • Marvey
      November 22, 13:43 Reply

      Thank you oo…the guy is not normal…what was he expecting before .. mtcheeew

    • Bleh
      November 25, 07:04 Reply

      Sending unsolicited nudes regardless of their profession is wrong and is even considered sexual assault and his being a sex worker shouldn’t be used as an excuse to condone it

      • Lol. Sending unsolicited scripts to my inbox is spamming and it is wrong, but reviewing screenplay is also my line of work. Meeting lecturers outside classroom to ask on matters you didn’t understand in class can be viewed as intrusive but teaching is their line of work. Lol. I call bluff. Nudity is part of his work, and he is not only a sex worker, he is also a call boy. Try to look serious in court, lol

        • Bleh
          November 25, 20:19 Reply

          Are u seriously defending sending unsolicited nude pics because said receiver is a call boy? So Call boys are deserving of having their personal space violated and btw sending unsolicited nudes is considered sexual assault and it isn’t in anyway equitable to receiving unsolicited screenplays in your inbox,being a call boy falls under the umbrella of sex work btw and that fact doesn’t seclude them from dignity and having the agency to protect their space

          • Shut up, Bleh. Sex work is legitimately about nudity, pornography. Sending nudes to an account that centers itself around nudes isn’t an indignity. If you push the context outside his line of work, outside the specific account he uses for this service, then it is an assault. Otherwise, as it is, it isn’t; his customers are just reaching out. So shut up, and take several seats.

            • Bleh
              November 26, 12:33 Reply

              This rhetoric mirrors that of men who justify the groping of women based on their attire being deemed seductive or strippers being groped without their consent,sex workers aren’t toys or objects put here on earth for your amusement they are service workers who render services for pay which doesn’t disavow them of the right to assert how they would like to be engaged or interacted with. i am just going to believe your response is an indication of how your view sex work and workers and well that is your burden to bear it doesn’t in anyway disavow this man or any other sex worker the right to assert how they like to be engaged or alienate them of their rights to deem an action inappropriate,i am not engaging further because i envision you doubling down

              • “This rhetoric mirrors…” Just look at the flawed analogy to have made based on ill-conceived assumptions. You have totally neglected context and argued with thoughts in your head. Sex workers aren’t toys and they have rights, yes, you mofo. Sex work is work and like every other work, they have customers. His audience was gay men because he acted in gay porn. Received gay nudity because he acts gay porn. Received invitations from gay men because he is a call boy who acted gay porn. The account on which all this was done was specifically on the account the man uses to reach out to his target audience. You clearly do not understand the concept of “context” which makes you a terrible debater. If these things were done outside the account or his line of work, sure then it can be considered sexual assault. Otherwise, no, it is not. And now that he has messaged that he doesn’t want those, then it is a problem to continue. (Remember he can be sued for false advertising, lol). Please go and learn how to debate. You can’t compare people reaching out to a sex worker/porn artist to people who molest women for their attire. What kind of nonsense analogy is that? And thanks for not engaging me any further because you weren’t making any sense anyway. Bye-bye, Bleh.

  8. Bleh
    November 26, 12:32 Reply

    This rhetoric mirrors that of men who justify the groping of women based on their attire being deemed seductive or strippers being groped without their consent,sex workers aren’t toys or objects put here on earth for your amusement they are service workers who render services for pay which doesn’t disavow them of the right to assert how they would like to be engaged or interacted with. i am just going to believe your response is an indication of how your view sex work and workers and well that is your burden to bear it doesn’t in anyway disavow this man or any other sex worker the right to assert how they like to be engaged or alienate them of their rights to deem an action inappropriate,i am not engaging further because i envision you doubling down.

Leave a Reply