Opinion: The Privilege of Positivity

Opinion: The Privilege of Positivity

Yesterday, a friend on social media challenged me to “only post positive messages for one whole day.”

It felt like part social media campaign and part gentle personal scolding: you’re producing too much negativity here.

I think she meant well and believe me, I do understand the sentiment—but honestly I don’t know what “positive” means to some people anymore. It seems like something is being lost in translation

To many people, positive seems to mean: to only speak happy words, to only focus on pleasant things, to never be combative or angry or grieving, to say nothing critical or confrontational about anyone.

It means pictures of babies and puppies and happy people on vacation—not of families in cages or deplorable detention centers or dying wildlife.

It means videos of cats in funny clothes—not of young unarmed black men being beaten by police in traffic stops.

It means beaming-smile selfies and feel good platitudes and perfectly framed food porn.

The request to “be positive” seems to mean to avoid giving someone any information (or providing that information in a way) that derails the path and plans and emotional state of their day. If it causes another person to become angry or to grieve or if it rubs up against a set of assumptions they have—then it’s negative.

We all have a natural empathy saturation point; a threshold where we reach where the bad news is too much to absorb, and with so much to be burdened by these days, the desire to escape some of it is natural and understandable—but it’s also a sure sign of our privilege too.

The very idea that we can have the option of escaping terrible news or sidestepping difficult conversations or limiting disturbing information, is itself confirmation that we are buffered from a good deal of struggle. That we can tire of a story or an issue—likely means we have no real personal stake in it.

Many people don’t have the option of avoiding negativity today.

They don’t have the privilege of not coming off as combative.

They don’t have the luxury of not fighting.

They can’t decide not to live with urgency in this day, because there is no other way to live in order to survive it.

There aren’t a lot of LGBT people or migrants or Muslims or people without healthcare or survivors of sexual assault or parents of transgender or teens saying, “Can you give me more puppy videos and less truthful news about our how broken our nation is?”

To me, activism is pure positivity.

It is passionately affirming humanity by taking note of the places it is most endangered and assailed.

It’s being for someone enough to advocate for them when they vulnerable and marginalized and invisible.

Being positive means being fully engaged in real life.

I’m all for looking for the good in people, for leaning into the hope, for staying optimistic about the future, for boosting encouragement, for cultivating joy, for taking time to enjoy meaningful moments with people you love, and even sharing puppy photos—but that has nothing to do with editing what I share so that it feels more pleasant or palatable to people who are shielded from danger enough to be annoyed by its news.

Yes, please give people funny videos and heartwarming images and stuff to make them laugh and breathe and rest. The world needs these things.

But as often as we share beautifully crafted Instagram images, we need to make sure we’re showing people reality completely unfiltered as well. The world needs this too.

If being positive means to not call out abject racism,

if it means not to advocate for migrant families in cages,

if it means to silently ignore human rights atrocities,

if it means allowing my LGBTQ friends to have their rights eroded,

if it means to make peace with bigotry in the highest levels of our Government,

if it means abiding Muslims being vilified,

if it means to allow legislative violence to go unopposed,

if it means standing by while fellow Christians pervert the message of Jesus,

if it means to avoid unpleasant conversations about the things that burden my heart because they make other people uncomfortable—then I guess I won’t be positive today.

Actually, I’m positive about that.

[This piece was originally published on johnpavlovitz.com]

Previous Lil Nas X Addresses His Revelation Of His Homosexuality
Next The Little Mermaid was originally a “love letter” to the author’s gay crush

About author

You might also like

Our Stories 1Comments

#HowIResist Campaign 21

Imagine you are a married, heterosexual person, and imagine your life up to this point altered in only one way, that instead of being partnered with someone of the opposite

Our Stories 27 Comments


Heartbreak. It’s not at all a good feeling. It is one of those dark places you fall into and eventually emerge, either made or marred. Many people will say to

Opinion Pieces 8 Comments


FOREWORD: Another ally speaks the message of love. Her name is Sally Dadzie, and what she has to say is very compelling. Check on it. * When I met him,


  1. Mandy
    July 07, 07:40 Reply

    Some people do not have the luxury of switching off. Of simply tuning out the negative and being all sunshine and light all day everyday. this is why i have a problem with people who lecture LGBT people for being extra, saying we should stop whining and just live our lives. Well, I wish we could simply do that. Except there’s that tiny thing called homophobia that has refused to allow us do that.

    July 07, 08:25 Reply

    And this is why I’d rather be realistic than optimistic. Alot of people may want to confuse being pessimistic with being realistic. It is my opinion that while we choose to see the silver lining in clouds and look at a glass as half full rather than half empty, we should not loose sight of what the true situation is – the actual clouds or the amount of water in the glass. While identifying problems, we should also try and identify possible solutions so we give hope and avoid despair while we come to terms with our various realities.

Leave a Reply