Will Gay Sex Ever Stop Being A Crime In Nigeria?
I remember sometime in 2013, when my learned friend and I were exchanging ideas on the possible legal defences open to people who face criminal charges in court for same-sex sexual offences. My colleague’s position back then was that apart from anal sex, all other sexual contacts between persons of the same-sex was no longer illegal in Lagos State. Therefore, any LGBT person charged to court for same-sex sexual offences in Lagos State cannot be convicted, provided he was not accused of having anal sex.
Needless to say, I found his position quite odd and hard to believe. My friend attempted citing the statutory authority he was relying on in support of his assertion, but wasn’t quite sure where or how he came across the statute. So, after listening to his hazy legal argument, I just dismissed his position as mere wishful thinking.
Fast-forward a few years later. I stumbled on a Lagos State legislation which cleverly omitted and then added a few socially sensitive provisions that scaled through the legislative hurdle without attracting any negative social attention. On 8th August 2011, the then-governor of Lagos State, Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola (SAN), assented to a new bill which repealed The Criminal Code Law Cap. C-17 Laws of Lagos State of Nigeria 2003 and replaced it with the new Criminal Law of Lagos State 2011. The repealed 2003 Criminal Law of Lagos State had all the usual colonial criminalization of anal sex and all other sexual activities between male persons. The new Criminal Law of Lagos State 2011, on the other hand, decriminalized all sexual activities between two consenting adults of the same-sex as long as they do not carry out any of their sexual activities in public. All the discriminatory provisions in the old law against the LGBT community were omitted in the new law.
It is worthy of note to observe here that this decriminalization happened at the same period when the rest of Nigeria was driving itself mad over same-sex marriage. While many of our national politicians were busy positioning themselves and getting ready to take advantage of the windfall expected to come from the anti-same-sex marriage frenzy, Lagos State was busy doing good, quietly and without affectation.
To underscore the scope of the good work the Lagos State House of Assembly and of course Mr. Babatunde Raji Fashola, did for the LGBT community, allow me to place the relevant provisions of the old law side by side with the relevant provisions of the new law:
CRIMINAL CODE LAW OF LAGOS STATE 2003
Section 214:
UNNATURAL OFFENCES
Any person who –
(1) Has carnal knowledge of any person against the order of nature; or
(2) Has carnal knowledge of an animal; or
(3) Permits a male person to have carnal knowledge of him or her against the order of nature; is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for fourteen years.
Section 215:
ATTEMPT TO COMMIT UNNATURAL OFFENCES
Any person who attempts to commit any of the offences defined in the last preceding section is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for seven years. The offender cannot be arrested without a warrant.
The Lagos State government took a look at those two provisions and thought they were so bad they just couldn’t be salvaged. So, they consigned both to the dustbin of our legal history.
CRIMINAL CODE LAW OF LAGOS STATE 2003
Section 216:
INDECENT TREATMENT OF BOYS UNDER FOURTEEN
Any person who unlawfully and indecently deals with a boy under the age of fourteen years is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for seven years. The term “deal with” includes doing any act which, if done without consent, would constitute an assault as hereinafter defined.
The Lagos State government refined this statute as:
CRIMINAL LAW OF LAGOS STATE 2011
Section 135:
INDECENT TREATMENT OF A CHILD
(1) Any person who unlawfully and indecently deals with a child commits a felony and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for seven (7) years.
(2) The term “deal with” includes doing any act which if done without consent, would constitute an assault.
CRIMINAL CODE LAW OF LAGOS STATE 2003
Section 217:
INDECENT PRACTICES BETWEEN MALES
Any male person who, whether in public or private, commits any act of gross indecency with another male person, or procures another male person to commit any act of gross indecency with him, or attempts to procure the commission of any such act by any male person with himself or with another male person, whether in public or private, is guilty of a felony, and is liable to imprisonment for three years.
The offender cannot be arrested without warrant.
CRIMINAL LAW OF LAGOS STATE 2011
Section 136:
INDECENT PRACTICES
Any person who commits any act of gross indecency with another person in public or procures another person to commit any act of gross indecency in public with him or another person commits a felony and is liable on conviction to imprisonment for three (3) years.
From the foregoing, it begins to look like the answer to our question appears to be a YES. It also seems to me that even the Sharia States of Northern Nigeria may not be a stumbling block towards this answer. In a previous article, I’d argued that contrary to the general perception among non-Muslims, it appears the anti-gay laws in the North are less stringent than those in the South. The burden of proof under Sharia law is so high that it is nearly impossible to convict anyone charged under it. Even where the convictions are secured, the sentence is almost always not carried out.
The decriminalization of gay sex in Nigeria can therefore happen within the foreseeable future.
Already, the former colonial authorities who imposed their homophobic legal cultures on African countries have not just abandoned those cultures, but are now expressing regret for leaving behind such unhealthy cultures and are subtly mounting pressure on African governments to abandon such a legacy. In her speech at the Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting in London 2018, Theresa May had this to say about the homophobic laws left behind by Britain in Nigeria:
“As the United Kingdom’s prime minister, I deeply regret both the fact that such laws were introduced and the legacy of discrimination, violence and death that persists today.”
Her tone was markedly different from the tactless and aggressive tone of Western countries in the recent past, which gave the impression that they had a neo-colonialist and imperialist agenda.
Having said all these, the reader still needs to be reminded that it is not yet uhuru in Lagos State; it is not yet “freedom at last”. This is so for the following reasons:
1. The Criminal Code Act is a Federal law deemed to have been made by the National Assembly based on the concurrent legislative list of the 1999 constitution. That law applies to all of Southern Nigeria. It still contains all the anti-LGBT provisions which were replicated in the 2003 Law repealed by Lagos State in 2011.
2. There is an inconsistency between The Lagos State Criminal Law 2011 and the Criminal Code Act. However, the Criminal Code Act has already “covered the field.” The doctrine of covering the field was defined by the Supreme Court in Attorney General of Ogun State & Ors v. Attorney General of the Federation (1982) NSCC (Vol. 13) 1 at 35, when it held that “where a matter legislated upon is in the concurrent list and the Federal Government has enacted a legislation in respect thereof, where the legislation enacted by the state is inconsistent with the legislation of the Federal Government, it is indeed void and of no effect for inconsistency.”
3. A defendant can still be arrested, charged and convicted at a State High Court of Lagos under this Federal Law.
So, what’s the point of all these, the reader may ask.
Well, I too admit that we are looking at a merely symbolic gesture here. But we need to keep hope alive. Firstly, we have now seen that decriminalization all over Nigeria is possible in the near future. Secondly, the reason behind the decriminalization in Lagos could be that Lagos State chose to start engaging the LGBT community in adult conversations. They seem to have chosen not to shut us up as if we were some juvenile delinquents.
What happened on 8th August 2011 in Lagos reminds me of one of history’s famous one-liners from Neil Armstrong as he emerged from the Apollo Lunar Module Eagle and became the first man to step on the surface of the moon on 20th July, 1969:
“That’s one small step for a man, one giant leap for mankind.”
Written by Legal Koboko
About author
You might also like
Mama Knows Best
So I decided to go to church yesterday. (Don’t ask me what made me want to go). I woke up very early and I was shining my shoe and ironing
Much Is Probably Most
So, I had always wondered what it would feel like to have a threesome. Yes, I know it may seem a little much, but hey, how many of us haven’t?
THE NIGHT I LET THE DEVIL USE ME
When people say, “Don’t let the devil use you,” they must not know that it can be so much fun if you simply let that happen. It was a rainy
10 Comments
Xavier Thicc
March 20, 09:08Nice Analyser @ legal koboko.
However, i am am Attorney who operates from the north axis of recent after my posting from our Lagos office.
I do not know if you have personally handled gay suspicion cases or perhaps I should refer it to be *Sexual offenses against the order of nature *, i wouldn’t know but I have on series of occassion.
You were right when you wrote that the Northern Criminal Procedure code, is less strigent as regards such legislations.. We apply more of CPC here, and i can categorically say that due to the cases I have handled, it’s still not a crime to be a gay in Nigeria.
I have been called to take up cases that even senior colleagues will reject as regards suspicion on homosexuality( I wonder why they do that), and when the matter goes to court, after much argument and cross examinations, the Judges ends up ruling no case submission on my behalf.. In the state where i am, i can say that having been visiting the Federal Prisons here, i can say that there is at least 1% convictions on such offenses, that’s before I came and may be some of them are close to finishing their sentences, so no need for an Appeal.
Recently, i had a divorce case where a wife applied for dissolution of marriage on the ground that the marriage has broken down irretrevably, based on the fact that her husband is asking for anal sex from her and she filed a sister case of criminal sexual offenses against the order of nature in a magistrate court, while the divorce proceedings was going on..
My office was contacted, and we had so much argument as to the definition of what sexual offenses against the order of nature is really?
On the day of the judgement, the Judge ruled that anal sex is not the only sexual offenses against the order of nature.
He went further to say that, is the hand meant for pussy as regards fingering, is the mouth meant to be placed in the vagina as regards sucking, is an adult meant to be sucking breasts and is the dick meant for sucking, he answered and said No. He further stated that in his opinion, it was not meant to be so from the beginning as it’s a Penis to a Vagina, so the woman who has been enjoying all forms of sexual foreplay from her husband cannot turn around and say her husband is engaged in sexual offenses against the order of nature, of which she has immensly enjoyed to the fullest. He said they should go back to their house and sought out themselves as he will not grant the divorce based on something both parties are *guilty of*…
Though they are on Appeal now, but I was very happy as I really conversed that argument very well, colleagues were telling me why I am putting so much on such cases, but only if they know…
I am waiting for them on Appeal..
In all these, yes the legislations are a bit stiff and all that, if as lawyers we can come together and make force to look for loopholes in our laws (that’s what we do in other legislations), it will go a long way… I may not know it all, i am very teachable.. We all can make it..
Another thing is, how many lawyers will come out and defend such cases amongst our community..?
That’s the big poser question.
I am ready, who else is?
I am so talking to my oga to take me back to Lagos, i pray it works out soon…
Legal koboko, again I say, Good one..
.
Legal Koboko
March 20, 10:54Good one Xavier Thicc.
If I remember bible passages correctly, your big possers reminds me of that Bible passage where Elija was feeling all alone, beating his chest in dispare, thinking he was the only surviving prophet of God.
And then God appeared to him and was like “taraaa! Introducing: a thousand more prophets ready to fight against Ba’al!!” ??
Lawyers have already started organizing and strategizing here in Lagos. There are Strategic Litigation Workshops going on for Lawyers interested in fighting all the anti-LGBT laws in Nigeria.
Let me know when you come over to Lagos so we can take it up from there.
Malik
March 20, 11:39Xavier Thicc. Please help us give that judge a beer!
kalid
March 22, 08:41“On the day of the judgement, the Judge ruled that anal sex is not the only sexual offenses against the order of nature.
He went further to say that, is the hand meant for pussy as regards fingering, is the mouth meant to be placed in the vagina as regards sucking, is an adult meant to be sucking breasts and is the dick meant for sucking, he answered and said No. He further stated that in his opinion, it was not meant to be so from the beginning as it’s a Penis to a Vagina”
This is all I need to counter them ‘straight’ arguments henceforth…..Nice one?
Thanks Xavier. Would like to connect with you if you don’t mind at all…
trystham
March 20, 09:12Am I the only person who kept seeing ‘male on male’ and wondering if only Gay guys make up the entirety of the homosexual world and LGBT??? I have always said it is a woman’s world LeSigh
Legal Koboko
March 20, 11:00You kept seeing “male on male” because we were talking about a law borrowed from the colonial folks. Those guys were so disrespectful of women they didn’t even bother looking into any “sexual impropriety” they may have been up to.
Even the section that prohibited anal sex was just pretending to include women, when in fact it was targeting gay men.
Xavier Thicc
March 20, 16:37On the 25th of March, i will be in Lagos till further notice.. I just got that posting few minutes ago in the office..
Guess this is a good one…
Though if I have cases around the north, i will Still go for them…
Patrick
March 20, 23:10Me, I’m just waiting for Kenya’s ruling on decriminalizing same-sex sex. Lol.
Bushbaby
March 20, 23:11This post and its comments just gave me life!
You lawyers be fighting the good fight. When it’s time for Lagos pride, me and my fellow dancers will lead the parade.
Rainbow Nova
March 22, 21:31(With a smile on my face and a leap in my heart), it’s not only the possible and eventual crash of the anti-LGBTQIA+ laws that makes me so happy and more hopeful right now and forever, it’s the truth that there truly are patriotic and diligent Nigerians. It shocks me at times to remember people like you Xavier Thicc and Legal Koboko exist and are involved in such reputable and fantastic work. You keep my dreams alive and make me proud to be a queen Nigerian, thank you for who you are, it’s more than you think, more than you know. Please continue and never stop being you, I say to every LGBTQIA+ Nigerian, we’ll make it, we always do.